Academic success for every child is my objective as a classroom teacher. This is not always an easy task. Our students arrive in our rooms with so many differences; differences in readiness, interests, learning styles, instructional needs and cultural backgrounds. In this course, I have gained knowledge of two frameworks for meeting the needs my diverse learners—Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Differentiated Instruction (DI). Like UDL, the DI approach embraces student diversity and encourages the modification of instruction to support students’ needs.
Reaching and Engaging All Learners Through Technology has taught me that differentiated instruction is about using teaching strategies and technological tools that connect with individual student's learning strategies. The ultimate goal is to provide a learning environment that will maximize the potential for student success. I will take from this course several salient concepts that will guide my instructional practices from now on: hold on to the effective teaching strategies that lead students to positive learning outcomes and to make adjustments when necessary, be flexible and open to change, take risks, and try teaching and learning strategies that I would have otherwise ignored. “Just as doctors must stay abreast of the latest medical research, and lawyers must keep up with case law, educators must stay current with practices that optimize student learning” (North Central Regional Education Laboratory & Metiri Group, 2003, p.11).
An invaluable resource that grew out of this course was our Ning group. This collaborative effort has yielded an abundance of links to informative assessments, technological tools and educational presentations. There is no doubt that as I grow and expand in my implementation of UDL and DI, and encourage my colleagues to do the same, I will be making reoccurring visits to our social network. The site that we created is a testament to the powerful and effective tool technology can be for gathering data about our students and providing instruction that recognizes and accommodates their interests, learning styles, intelligence preferences, and learning profiles.
This course, Reaching and Engaging All Learners Through Technology, has solidified the importance of continually collecting a variety of data about my students. As an outgrowth, I plan to continue exploring the use of technology to facilitate this process. A new essential staple of my first weeks of school will be various inventories that lead me to know more about my students learning preferences as early as possible. This inevitability allows me to begin to differentiate based on students’ learning styles early on.
Another difficult adjustment I plan on implementing for the following school year, involves relinquishing some control, and learning to trust the process. The current emphasis, in this school system, is on a prescribed curriculum and pacing charts that define what and when the curriculum is taught. At first glance, this inhibits opportunities to vary the curriculum and pacing necessary to differentiate. However, if I begin with the end in mind, knowing intuitively, and supported by data, that my best practices are the most effective means of instruction, then I will force the parallel lines to meet. After all, “The goal of education is not simply the mastery of knowledge; it is the mastery of learning,” (National Center on Universal Design for Learning, 2009).
References
Introduction | National Center On Universal Design for Learning. (2009). Home | National Center On Universal Design for Learning. Retrieved January 17, 2010, from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines/introduction
North Central Regional Education Laboratory & Metiri Group. (2003). enGauge 21st Century Skills: Literacy in the digital age. Retrieved from
http://www.grrec.ky.gov/SLC_grant/engauge21st_Century_Skills.pdf
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)